
25.08.2025
13:36
Kompletter Zahlenbericht des Spiels
Florian Badstübner / 4,5 (souveräne Partie, bis auf die VAR-Problematik) | #FCBRBL | ||||||
Allianz Leipzig ( 75000 / av) | 7559 (5031) (+2528) | ||||||
24/25 RBL: 5031, 5614 | |||||||
Tore | |||||||
1:0 – Olise | 27. A: – | System | |||||
2:0 – Diaz | 32. A: Gnabry | 4-2-3-1 vs 4-3-3 | |||||
3:0 – Olise | 42. A: Gnabry | 4-2-3-1 vs 4-2-1-1 | |||||
4:0 – Kane | 64. A: Diaz | 2-1-7-0 vs 5-4-1 | |||||
5:0 – Kane | 74. A: Diaz | ||||||
6:0 – Kane | 77. A: Kim | ||||||
FCB | (1.) | 6 : 0 (3:0) | (7.) | RBL | |||
ELO 1916 (0) | SUN 9 – 7 – 2 | ELO 1716 (0) | |||||
Last 3: 0 | 22.08.2025 – 8:30 pm – | Last 3: 0 | |||||
7,00 | Stärkefaktor | 6,56 | |||||
Erreichter Leistungswert (top:2,22) This Match: middle | 2,235 | < Score | OFFENSE | Score > | 1,484 | ||
17 | Intensiv Attacks | 14 | |||||
Angriffe mit min. 1 OFF-Aktion Nähe Box | |||||||
RBL erzielte 11 Attacks in HZ2 und kassierte 0:3 Tore… | 8 | HT1 | 3 | ||||
9 | HT2 | 11 | |||||
3 | 1-15 | 1 | |||||
3 | 16-30 | 1 | |||||
2 | 31-45 | 1 | |||||
4 | 46-60 | 7 | |||||
3 | 61-75 | 2 | |||||
2 | 76-90 | 2 | |||||
123 | – | Attack startet | – | 55 | |||
58 | – | HT1 | – | 17 | |||
18 | -1 | xAttacks | -1 | 15 | |||
erwartete Attacks | |||||||
61,3 | possessions % | 38,7 | |||||
RBL erreichte trotz ihres geringeren Ballbesitz mehr Attacks | 14 | Attacks by 50:50 possession | 18 | ||||
1,96 | – | xG | – | 0,53 | |||
0,10 | – | xG Ø | – | 0,04 | |||
61,9 | – | CQ % | – | 55,3 | |||
Proprietary system based on proprietary formula | |||||||
7 | Big Chances* | 1 | |||||
4 | HT1 | 1 | |||||
5 | Goals | 0 | |||||
5 | Open Play | 0 | |||||
5 | Goals | 0 | |||||
20 | Chances sum | 12 | |||||
73,5 | Chance Quality for Goal % | 0,0 | |||||
Verhältnis Shots/xG/Attack-Leistung zu Attacksanzahl | 4,54 | – | EASR | – | 0,94 | ||
Effective Attack Success Rate | |||||||
19 | Shots | 12 | |||||
10 | 52,6% | on target | 8,3% | 1 | |||
4 | 21,1% | off target | 33,3% | 4 | |||
11,…Sehr wenig zum verhältnismäßigen Gesamtwert | 11 | OpenPlay | 9 | ||||
13 | 68,4% | inBox | 58,3% | 7 | |||
9 | 69,2% | on target | 0,0% | 0 | |||
3,17 | xGOT | 0,13 | |||||
0,35 | xGOT/Shot | 0,00 | |||||
2 | off target | 2 | |||||
6 | OpenPlay | 1 | |||||
3 | Goals | 0 | |||||
15 Shots mit mehr Distanz als 11m… | 4 | 21,1% | Distance ≤ 11m | 25,0% | 3 | ||
3 | 23,1% | on target | 0,0% | 0 | |||
1 | off target | 2 | |||||
1 | OpenPlay | 2 | |||||
1 | 5,3% | 6yd Box | 0,0% | 0 | |||
0 | OpenPlay | 0 | |||||
0 | Goals | 0 | |||||
7 | 36,8% | out of box | 41,7% | 5 | |||
0 | Goals | 0 | |||||
1 | 14,3% | on target | 20% | 1 | |||
5 | OpenPlay | 4 | |||||
5 | 26,3% | Shot blocked | 58,3% | 7 | |||
7 | 58,3% | Blocked Shots | 26,3% | 5 | |||
5 | 71,4% | Blocked InBox | 7,7% | 1 | |||
Attack Sharing | |||||||
Verteilung der Shots pro Attack (100%) | 17 | Intensiv Attacks | 14 | ||||
111,8% | Shots | 85,7% | |||||
64,7% | OpenPlay | 64,3% | |||||
58,8% | on target | 7,1% | |||||
35,3% | OpenPlay on target | 7,1% | |||||
76,5% | inBox | 50,0% | |||||
23,5% | Distance ≤ 11m | 21,4% | |||||
5,9% | OpenPlay | 14,3% | |||||
17,6% | on target | 0,0% | |||||
41,2% | Big Chance | 7,1% | |||||
Schusserzeugende Aktionen | 36 | – | SCA | – | 21 | ||
2,2 | xA | 0,9 | |||||
1,4 | xAG | 0,4 | |||||
0,06 | xA/SCA | 0,04 | |||||
0,28 | xAG/SCA | 0 | |||||
15 | – | Pass Assists | – | 8 | |||
78,9 | – | PaA%Shots | – | 66,7 | |||
8 | Crosses | 3 | |||||
1 | + | 0 | |||||
0 | Shot | 0 | |||||
0 | Goal | 0 | |||||
5 | Corner | 5 | |||||
1 | + | 2 | |||||
0 | Shot | 0 | |||||
0 | Goal | 0 | |||||
0 | Freekicks near Box | 2 | |||||
0 | + | 0 | |||||
0 | Shot | 0 | |||||
0 | Goal | 0 | |||||
0 | Penalty | 0 | |||||
0 | Goal | 0 | |||||
656 | Passes | 388 | |||||
599 | 91,3% | + | 82,2% | 319 | |||
57 | – | 69 | |||||
Schwache Werte bei beiden Teams | 11 | – | Passes in Box (PPA) | – | 12 | ||
Innerhalb der Red Zone KEIN Pass inBox…!!!!!!!!! | 0 | – | PPA Attackzone | – | 0 | ||
0,0 | – | % | – | 0,0 | |||
0,65 | PPA per Attack | 0,86 | |||||
37 | – | In Box Actions | – | 28 | |||
24 | – | (without Shots) | – | 21 | |||
24:13 | – | InBoxActions:ShoutsInBox | – | 21:7 | |||
Gegner füllt effektiv die Ballbesitzzeit mit Actions | 0,79 | – | InBoxAction/Score/Ballbesitz | – | 1,36 | ||
17 | Intensiv Attacks | 14 | |||||
Action per Attack | 1,41 | – | InBoxAction/IntAttack | – | 1,50 | ||
194 | – | Passes in Final 1/3 | – | 84 | |||
29,6 | – | %/Passes | – | 21,6 | |||
56 | – | Passes INTO Final 1/3 | – | 17 | |||
51 | – | Progessive Passes | – | 31 | |||
Bayern kaum aktiv vor der RBL-Box | 18 | – | Passes in Attackzone | – | 19 | ||
7 | – | HT1 | – | 5 | |||
Normaly Value 29 (vs 16) | |||||||
Diaz (6/4), Olise (6/3), Gnabry (4/2), Kane (3/2) | 25 | Dribbles | 23 | ||||
14 | won | 13 | |||||
14 | Throw In | 9 | |||||
26 | Pass to Keeper | 34 | |||||
68 | Sequenz Player-Keeper-Passes | 78 | |||||
588 | Netto open play | 310 | |||||
Passanteil der Keeper | 10,4 | %Passes | 20,1 | ||||
11 | Final Passes | 14 | |||||
5 | + | 4 | |||||
1 | before Box | 3 | |||||
1 | + | 2 | |||||
0 | Chance | 1 | |||||
0 | Goals | 0 | |||||
8 | InBox | 2 | |||||
4 | + | 1 | |||||
3 | Chance | 0 | |||||
1 | Goals | 0 | |||||
5 Cross in (Boden) schaffen die wenigsten Gegner… | 2 | Cross InBox | 5 | ||||
0 | + | 1 | |||||
1 | Chance | 1 | |||||
0 | Goals | 0 | |||||
Qualität der finalen Pässe unabhängig des Empfangs | 0,697 | FPQ/Pass | 0,625 | ||||
5,67 | Final Share on 3/3Passes % | 16,67 | |||||
top > 13% | |||||||
Beide Teams erzielen geringen DEF-Score | 2,790 | < Score | DEFENSE | Score > | 3,851 | ||
40 | 48,8% | Duels | 51,2% | 42 | |||
Sehr wenig Kopfballduelle | 4 | 57,1% | Air Duels | 42,9% | 3 | ||
7 | Attacks Blocked | 22 | |||||
33,3 | – | % | – | 56,4 | |||
16 | Clearances | 22 | |||||
10 | Interceptions | 9 | |||||
18 | Tackles | 15 | |||||
7 | won | 12 | |||||
38,9 | % | 80,0 | |||||
Wenig Defensivaktionen beider Teams | 77 | SAVES | 88 | ||||
Wenig Aufwand pro Attackversuch eines Teams | 1,40 | Saves pro Attack | 0,72 | ||||
4,23 | < Score | Stability | Score > | 4,14 | nochmachen | ||
Upa (1) Diaz (1) | 2 | – | Unforced Errors | – | 5 | ||
Upa (1) Stanisic (1) Boey (1) | 3 | – | Dangerous Passes | – | 3 | ||
Sehr schlechtes Stellungsspiel bei FCB-Attacks | 0 | – | Position Error | – | 8 | ||
5 | Sum | 16 | |||||
0 | Result Goals | 5 | |||||
13 | Fouls | 13 | |||||
2 | Offsides | 0 | |||||
61,3 | possessions % | 38,7 | |||||
4 | Yellow Cards | 1 | |||||
Extrem hoher Bayern-Wert… | 125,4 | Tracking (km) | 118,6 | ||||
200 | Sprints | 188 | |||||
43 | Goalkeeper Actions | 48 | |||||
1 | Saves | 3 | |||||
0 | Clearances | 1 | |||||
47 | – | DEF Actions own half | – | 63 | |||
Wert der Verschiebung und Zirkulation eines Teams | |||||||
Bewegunsintensität gegen den Ball oder Gegner | 5/10 | Dynamic Score | 6/10 | ||||
Team | Team | ||||||
Points | Points | ||||||
Team/ELO-Score | |||||||
Leistungsanalyse | 94 | 0 | 0 | 118 | |||
<141 strong <131 good <115 not good | 1916 | 0 | 0 | 1716 | |||
185,720 | 0 | 0 | 186,397 |
23.08.2025
10:17
Crawled Stats Sites of the Match
https://www.fotmob.com/de/matches/bayern-munchen-vs-rb-leipzig/856w9cm#4824901:tab=stats
https://www.sofascore.com/de/football/match/rb-leipzig-fc-bayern-munchen/xdbskCo#id:14056037,tab:statistics
22.08.2025
23:16
23:09
23:05

21.08.2025
13:34
Tim Bischof muss sich einer kurzfristigen Blinddarm-OP unterziehen und wird für das Leipzig-Spiel ausfallen.
12:59

12:04